|
Users Get Analysis of Financial Situation and Choice of Rate Options
A Blue Ribbon Committee of the Howell Mountain Mutual Water Company has completed a report of the financial condition of the company and proposed two options for raising revenue.
THE ANGWIN REPORTER is presenting the Committee's three reports in full, slightly edited: Why so much attention to this subject? Because 385 families in Angwin and Deer Park depend upon the company for their water. That is 35% of our population.
Report #1 - The Financial Situation
What is the Problem?
The fact of the matter is that the water company, which we own, has run out of money. The purpose of this Report by the independent Blue Ribbon Committee is to tell the membership just how serious our problem is.
1. There is a stack of bills on the office manager's desk which we cannot pay.
2. The line of credit for $100,000 at the bank has been exhausted.
3. We have a reserve in the bank to pay our debt to the State for money borrowed many years ago for purchase and upgrades to our water system. Last month, the Board had to dip into that fund to pay current bills.
4. Our operations manager has given us a $40,000 list of immediate operating needs. This includes repairs to the filter plant that must be made now to produce the water quality the State requires.
5. Three years ago, a landslide from a vineyard carried soil into two of our lakes and polluted the water supply. We must budget substantial sums to legally recover the costs to our system.
6. The State of California long ago gave our company certain rights to collect and impound water. We are endeavoring to revise those water rights and address the seismic condition of the dams. We need $40,000 to pay legal and engineering costs to satisfy the State this year.
7. Meanwhile, our system continues to deteriorate. The White Cottage line is being held together with band-aids on top of band-aids. It may cost $1.6 million to reconstruct that line alone.
8. Past Boards created no reserve for replacement of lines as they wear out. Some of the deferred repairs can be put off no longer. They total more than $5 million.
These are the facts concerning the short-term financial problems of your company. Yes, it will cost money to meet the challenge. But we believe that the rate proposals will be fair and far-reaching. We can solve our financial problems.
Report #2 - Much to be thankful for
The HMMWC, A Valuable Asset?
Given our serious financial situation, there is no question but that immediate action is necessary. Some of those actions are presented in Report #3 which follows. But - on the positive side - we need to understand why these problems are not insurmountable. This community has the intelligence, commitment, leadership and will to maintain this asset under local control.
Just consider the value of this asset of ours:
- We own over 235 acres of valuable Napa Valley watershed millions of dollars.
- We have the water rights from a 600-acre watershed basin.
- We own lakes, dams, and treatment facilities capable of capturing, storing, and treating approximately 825 acre-feet of high-quality water within our system.
- We deliver water to a stable base of 385 users and the potential to serve more.
There is an up-side to each of the problems we face.
The prospects are good for solidifying our water rights. We believe the State Dept. of Water Resources will once and for all give us final legal certainty for exclusive use of all of the runoff from the basin, in perpetuity.
A do-able plan has been developed for the Water Company to increase the capacity of Lake Henne sufficiently to provide for safe storage of all of our water under current dam safety standards. County Measure A funds will be available to implement this project.
While the distribution system suffers from significant deferred maintenance, our Company has been actively applying for State Water Bond grants for improvement to the distribution system under California Proposition 50. Federal Community Development Block Grants are also achievable and the first $35,000 in these funds was allocated this year. With future Statewide infrastructure bonds almost a certainty in the next 1-2 years, grants will continue to be available for small California water systems.
The Company's long-term State loans still enjoy low interest and will be paid off by 2018, thus freeing up working capital.
The quality of our water exceeds all State Standards and the treatment facilities, while suffering from deferred maintenance, are modern and efficient having been upgraded and installed with State loans of $2.5 million in 1991.
The continued threat to our water quality from adjacent hillside vineyard erosion and potential winery development is a serious one. The Company is now negotiating with one private party whose vineyard development has produced increased turbidity, iron and manganese in our system. While our legal action can be costly, we are confident that these costs will be recovered.
In short, we own a tremendously valuable asset. Managed wisely and fund-ed adequately, it can continue to give us pure water at a reasonable cost.
Report #3 - Two Options
Two Revenue-Raising Options
The Blue Ribbon Committee is NOT authorized to adjust rates. The elected Board of Directors alone has the option of standing by its proposed $50 a month increase in rates or giving members the two options recommended by the Blue Ribbon Committee.
Editorial note: Contents of the Committee Report #3 have been rewritten below for brevity.
Members have been paying for their water in two ways. They pay a $38 a month flat fee. That also gives them 415 cu. ft. of water free. Then, they pay for any additional water they use at the rate of 9.17 cents per cubic foot of water.
To solve our financial problems, it will be necessary to raise $150,000 more revenue each year. That is about 30% more than the existing rate schedule is producing.
The Blue Ribbon Committee believes that the $50 a month increase in the flat fee proposed by the Board is too high. Its calculations indicate that the flat fee of $38 a month plus additional water usage by members will suffice.
The Committee is proposing two options.
OPTION A. Members choosing Option A will pay the existing $38 per month flat fee. but they will get no free water for that, as heretofore. They will pay 9.17 cents for every cubic foot of water used. They can reduce their water usage or increase it as they wish, month by month.
OPTION B. Members choosing Option B will pay the same flat fee as Option A and the same price of 9.17 cents for any water they use.
However, the Option B user will be given the opportunity to buy additional water at a greater reduced rate. If he agrees to use the same amount of water he has used monthly, on average over the past three years, he will be given a bonus for buying MORE water. That bonus will be a generous $1,000 worth of free water. (That amounts to $82 worth of free water each month.)
Option B is a plain and simple marketing proposal - "if you buy more of our product, we will give it to you at a dramatically reduced rate."
Each member will be given a choice of the two Options. Each member will receive from the company a report of what he would experience under both plans.
|
This is kinda different
The rationale for Option B is very different for users. Ordinarily, we are asked to conserve water, and any increase in the rates prompts users to cut back on their consumption. That doesn't produce the additional income we need.
The fact is that we have plenty of water. Our reservoirs need an average rainfall of 27 inches to fill to capacity. Our annual rainfall is far higher - about 42 inches. Not only that. Of the 835,000 acre-feet that we capture, we are losing a great deal through evaporation.
So, the Blue Ribbon Committee reasons, why should we let our product just sit in the warehouse? Let's try to sell it. Let's make it possible for members to buy more. At a lower rate.
Initial reactions are positive. This can be a win-win situation.
|
|